Christian Ministry I-Worship

Current Status
Not Enrolled
Price
Closed
Get Started

30

Lessons

30

Videos

13

QUIZZES

6 Weeks

Duration

English

Language

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course explores a theological understanding of worship as it relates to Christian practice over the past two millennia. Current worship trends in Indian churches will be evaluated in light of this theological and historical perspective.

COURSE INTEGRATION

The term “worship” defies simple definition. It can mean what we do as a church for an hour on Sunday. Some refer to the music portion of the service as “worship.” Still, others say that worship is a lifestyle and encompasses anything and everything that we do. How should we define it? In this course, we will examine this subject by looking at scripture through the lens of worship. We will survey both Old and New Testaments asking ourselves “What does the text have to say about how we should worship?” Secondly, we will examine how the church throughout history has answered that question. Finally, we will apply what we’ve learned to our current context by looking at contemporary issues involving how worship is practiced the today’s churches in India and around the world

LEARNING OUTCOMES

At the end of the course, students will be able to gain:

A. Knowledge:

  1. Develop and refine a general understanding of biblical teaching about worship
  2. Interact with a number of thinkers in the area of worship studies
  3. Acquire knowledge to develop personal actions in corporate and individual worship
  4. Develop a theology of worship
  5. Gain a deeper historical perspective of current worship practices

B. Skills:

  1. Articulate a biblical theology of worship
  2. Evaluate corporate worship in light of biblical teaching and examples
  3. Contribute to and participate in corporate worship in a more meaningful way

C. Attitude:

  1. Give increasing value to God as subject and object in personal and corporate worship
  2. Heighten awareness of the various theological tensions in worship
  3. Discern holistic worship as related to spirit and truth
  4. Gain a broader appreciation of the wide spectrum of worship traditions

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

REQUIRED READING

Peterson, David. Engaging With God: A Biblical Theology of Worship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992. Click here to download

Webber, Robert E. Worship Old & New. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009. Click here to download

SUPPLEMENTARY / RECOMMENDED READING AND TOOLS (Bibliography)

Bateman, Herbert W. IV, ed. Authentic Worship: Hearing Scripture’s Voice, Applying Its Truths. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Inc., 2002. 

Beale, G. K. We Become What We Worship: A Biblical Theology of Idolatry. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2008.

Benedict, Daniel, and Craig Miller. Contemporary Worship For The 21st Century. Nashville, TN: Discipleship Resources, 1998

Brueggemann, Walter. Israel’s Praise: Doxology against Idolatry and Ideology. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1988.

Campbell, Heidi A. (ed.) Digital Ecclesiology. Digital Religion Publications, 2020.

Carson, D.A., ed. Worship By The Book. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2002.

Chapell, Bryan. Christ Centered Worship: Letting the Gospel Shape Our Practice. Grand Rapids MI: Baker Academic, 2009.

Costa, Tony, Worship and the Risen Jesus in the Pauline Letters, New York: Peter Lang, 2013.

Drury, Keith. The Wonder of Worship: Why We Worship The Way We Do. Marion, IN: Wesleyan Publishing House, 2002.

Dryness, William A. A Primer on Christian Worship. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009.

Erickson, Gary D., Pentecostal Worship: A Biblical and Practical Approach, Weldon Spring, MO: Word Aflame Press, 1989.

Frame, John M. Worship In Spirit And Truth. Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Publishers, 1996.

Articles: (Available in PDF format) 

Moss, Phyllis Anita, “The role of the praise and worship leader: a model for preparing the singer for leadership in contemporary worship” (2001). ETD Collection for AUC Robert W. Woodruff Library. Paper AAIDP14652.

Mabry, Paul, “A Strategy for the Implementation of Contemporary Worship in a Church of the Nazarene”, Lynchburg, Virginia A Thesis project submitted to Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, D.Min, 2004 (44- 56)2011

Rowan, Karen D. “A Design for a Christian Contemporary Worship Environment,” 2001 A Thesis submitted to the Department of Interior Design in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts

Riches, Tanya, “What Makes Our Worship “Pentecostal”?

Marius Nel, “Attempting to develop a Pentecostal theology of worship”

Mookgo S. Kgatle, “Singing as a therapeutic agent in Pentecostal worship”

Williams, Andrew, Spiritual landscapes of Pentecostal worship, belief, and embodiment in a  therapeutic community: New critical perspectives.

GUIDELINES FOR INTERACTIONS

We anticipate our students to have varied viewpoints which will enrich the discussions in our learning community. Therefore, we ask our students to be charitable and respectful in their interactions with each other, and to remain focused on the topic of discussion, out of respect to others who have committed to being a part of this learning community.

ASSIGNMENTS AND GRADING

  1. Discussion Forum

A. Weekly Discussions and Written Responses: 200 Words each (Total 35%).

Late responses are not accepted. Each week’s initial response is due on Wednesday (11:59 pm) and interactions with other responses are due on Saturday (11:59 pm)

Attendance in this course is demonstrated by regular log-ins and up-to-date participation in forums.

Every Monday a weekly discussion question will become visible. Each student will read through the question and take time to formulate a response.

Aim for responses that display a thorough understanding of the textbooks and primary sources relevant to each question and a clear engagement with the class discussions and lectures, especially identifying areas of your understanding of each week’s themes that have challenged, changed, and/or enriched you. This is not a summary of the readings and the lectures, but a response to particular themes/arguments. Be specific and brief, but not superficial.

The initial response should be 200 words but there is no set limit on words for the subsequent interactions between students. In order to maximize the benefit of this element of the course, the student should post his/her initial response by 11:59 pm on Wednesday of the week and then spend the remainder of that week interacting with their colleagues in the class until Saturday at 11:59 pm.

Each weekly question and themes will be discussed on following week during optional class meetings

Discussion Forum and Grading Rubric (see the General Grading from FBC Grading standards)

Areas of Evaluation
Grade A
Grade B
Grade C
Grade D
Completeness of post
Addresses all parts of question; meets and did not exceed word limit; comprehensive response
Addresses all parts of question; respectable length & did not exceed limit; somewhat comprehensive
Addresses some parts of question; shorter length; incomplete post
Rarely addresses question; far too short or far too long; incomplete post
Clarity of post
Clear and concise posts; grammatically correct with rare
Clear, but can be more concise; a few grammatical or spelling errors
Somewhat clear, but with significant number of errors in spelling and grammar
Unclear, poor spelling and grammar in most posts
Critical engagement with class material (lectures, readings)
Thoughtful; opinions and ideas are substantiated with class material and additional resources (quotations and/or references); active reflection & questioning; obvious integration with one’s context
Thoughtful; opinions and ideas are occasionally substantiated with class material; some reflection & questioning; some integration
Less thoughtful; opinions and ideas are sometimes substantiated with class material; insufficient reflection & questioning; less integration with one’s context
Opinions and ideas are not substantiated with class material; no reflection & questioning; no integration with one’s context
Promptness & quality of responses
Posting on time; responds to all group members’ comments on your post, interacting with other students’ postings in timely manner; thoughtful responses
Posting on time; responds to some of group members’ comments on your post, limited interaction with other students’ postings in timely manner; somewhat thoughtful responses
Posting mostly on time; interaction with only 1-2 students’ postings; less thoughtful responses
Late posting; rarely responds to group members’ comments on your post and/or students’ postings; responses not thoughtful

B. Reading Response to Robert E. Webber* (15%)  Due on the last day of 3rd               Week.

Read 300 pages from the “Recommended Source” list in this syllabus (above). Prepare a critical book review with less than 3 pages (15 Marks).

C. Essay/Research Paper: 1000 Words, 35%.(25 Marks) Due on the last day of               classes.

D. SUMMARY OF ASSIGNMENTS AND GRADING

Evaluation is based upon the completion of the following assignments:

1.

Weekly Discussions and Responses

35 %

2.

Daily Quiz

15 %

3.

Critical Book Review

15 %

4.

Research/Essay Paper

35 %

5.

Total Grade

100 %

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN WORK

Submission Method and Late Submission
Submission: Papers to be submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format via Global Classroom

Late Submission Penalties:

  1. Weekly Responses and Primary Source Analysis Paper will NOT be accepted as
  2. All other late assignments will be penalized 1% (1 point) per

Citing References
In all assigned work, proper style guidelines must be used and followed exactly; failure to do so will render the submitted assignment unacceptable.

For proper citation style, consult the FBC Style Guide or the full edition of the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers: Seventh Edition, especially chapters 5 and 6 for arrangement of entries through in-text citations and Works Cited.

Academic Integrity
Integrity in academic work is required of all our students. Academic dishonesty is any breach of this integrity, and includes such practices as cheating (the use of unauthorized material on tests and examinations), submitting the same work for different classes without permission of the instructors; using false information (including false references to secondary sources) in an assignment; improper or unacknowledged collaboration with other students, and plagiarism.

Global Classroom takes seriously its responsibility to uphold academic integrity, and to penalize academic dishonesty.

COURSE EVALUATION (Feedback)

Global Classroom values quality in the courses it offers its students. End-of-course evaluations provide valuable student feedback and are one of the ways that Global Classroom works towards maintaining and improving the quality of courses and the student’s learning experience. Student involvement in this process is critical to enhancing the general quality of teaching and learning.

Before the end of the course, students will receive an email with a link to the online course evaluation. The link can also be found in the left column on the course page. The evaluation period is 2 weeks; after the evaluation period has ended, it cannot be reopened.

Course Evaluation results will not be disclosed to the instructor before final grades in the course have been submitted and processed. Student names will be kept confidential and the instructor will only see the aggregated results of the class.

ONLINE PRIMARY SOURCE READINGS

The readings can be found as PDF files on the course web page at under “Materials”.

Learning Path

Course Content

Expand All
WEEK 01 - ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF WORSHIP
WEEK 02 - WORSHIP IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
WEEK 03 -WORSHIP IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
WEEK 04 - HISTORY OF WORSHIP
WEEK 05 - THEOLOGY OF WORSHIP
WEEK 06 - PRACTICE OF WORSHIP

About the Instructor

Scroll to Top

Have Questions?

Do you have any questions or doubts about theological education or online learning?

Drop us a note and our academic counsellor will get in touch with you.